Which states are keeping track and which aren’t

When bad teachers are fired or disciplined, how easy is it to track them?

Only seven states got an “A” in a USA Todaysurveythat ranked states across the nation on background checks, transparency on teacher disciplinary actions, mandatory reporting laws and how states handle sharing information about teachers’ misconduct with other states.wholesale jerseys

The survey indicates there are big gaps in info about teachers and points to a need for better coordination in collecting and sharing information about the misconduct of teachers. It refers to America’s process for vetting teachers as “a loosely connected patchwork of state laws and procedures, inconsistent practices by school districts and state officials, and wide variations in who’s accountable for what and how accountable they are.”1912 eighth grade exam: Could you make it to high school in 1912?

Here’s how the reporting system works now, according to USA Today:An examination of records aboutteachers disciplined in all 50 states found more than 1,400 cases where a teacher permanently lost his or her licensebut was not listed in the NASDTEC database.

“The National Education Association supports a great public school teacher for every child. Every state now requires background checks for teachers, and nearly all of these involve fingerprint based checks of the FBI database,” says Alice O’Brien, general counsel at the National Education Association in an email to the Monitor. Department of Education.

The USA Today grade reflects the state’s record of transparency.

“We are certainly pleased to have our processes highlighted, .

But Massachusetts and 10 other states flunked.

In an e mail response to questions about the survey, the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education writes, “Massachusetts takes student safety seriously and shares information with NASDTEC about educators’ licenses that were revoked or suspended, and we also check NASDTEC updates against educators in our database. Massachusetts has already taken state level action to improve background checks on educators, as illustrated by changes that began in 2013 and expanded the required state background check to include having educators’ fingerprints checked against a national criminal database.”The USA Today report card by state:

A: Alabama, Hawaii, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, and Vermont.

B: Arizona, California, Iowa, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Washington.

C: Arkansas, Colorado, Montana, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

D: Connecticut, Indiana, Rhode Island, Missouri, Mississippi, Nevada, Virginia, Utah, and Wyoming.

“What this survey points to is deep flaws and inconsistencies in what we track and how we act on it nationally and to highly variable standards and in some cases a lack of standards,” saysPaul Reville, director of the Education Redesign Lab at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education in a phone interview. “We need to set national standards for the protection of children, rather than allow for this kind of widespread variability that this survey uncovers.”

According to the report, Virginia got a “D.”

Dr. Warren Stewart, a retired Virginia school superintendent, former classroom teacher, principal and recently retired Norfolk school board member who sat on the Virginia teacher licensure panel for four years says in a phone interview, “My initial reaction is that anything that I could get as a superintendent, or as a colleague teacher, that would continue to give me assurances that my colleagues were the best possible person to work with the children that I was working with would be something that I would welcome and want.”

While the survey reports that Virginia does have a mandatory system for reporting teacher misconduct, the state got the “D” for having little teacher data online, background checks left up to individual districts and only sharing some teacher misconduct with other states.

Mr. Stewart says. “I can’t understand why anybody wouldn’t want the best possible information on which to feel comfortable with their colleagues. To me it’s a no brainer. We need a better, more uniform system.”

Cathleen Palm, founder of the Center for Children’s Justice in Pennsylvania, a state that got a “B” from the survey says in a phone interview, “All states should run the same type of background check and not only in your own state, but across state lines. Don’t “pass the trash,” is what people call it.”

Ms. Palm adds that her concerns extend beyond potential sexual predators to the physical abuse of children, particularly those who are disabled or have special needs.